首页> 外文OA文献 >Experiences of recruiting to a pilot trial of Cardiac Rehabilitation In patients with Bowel cancer (CRIB) with an embedded process evaluation: Lessons learned to improve recruitment
【2h】

Experiences of recruiting to a pilot trial of Cardiac Rehabilitation In patients with Bowel cancer (CRIB) with an embedded process evaluation: Lessons learned to improve recruitment

机译:通过嵌入式过程评估招募肠癌患者(CRIB)心脏康复试验的经验:改进招募的经验教训

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Recruitment to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is a perennial problem. Calls have been made for trialists to make recruitment performance publicly available. This article presents our experience of recruiting to a pilot RCT of cardiac rehabilitation for patients with bowel cancer with an embedded process evaluation.Methods: Recruitment took place at three UK hospitals. Recruitment figures were based on the following: i) estimated number of patient admissions, ii) number of patients likely to meet inclusion criteria from clinician input and iii) recruitment rates in previous studies. The following recruitment procedure was used:1. Nurse assessed patients for eligibility.2. Patients signed a screening form indicating interest in and agreement to be approached by a researcher about the study.3. An appointment was made at which the patient signed a consent form and was randomised to the intervention or control group.Information about all patients considered for the study and subsequently included or excluded at each stage of the recruitment process and reasons given were recorded.Results: There were variations in the time taken to award Research Management approval to run the study at the three sites (45–359 days). Sixty-two percent of the original recruitment estimate was reached. The main reason for under-recruitment was due to over-estimation of the number of patient admissions; other reasons were i) not assessing all patients for eligibility, ii) not completing a screening form for eligible patients and iii) patients who signed a screening form being lost to the study before consenting and randomisation.Conclusions: Pilot trials should not simply aim to improve recruitment estimates but should also identify factors likely to influence recruitment performance in a future trial and inform the development of that trial’s recruitment strategies. Pilot trials are a crucial part of RCT design. Nevertheless, pilot trials are likely to be small scale, involving only a small number of sites, and contextual differences between sites are likely to impact recruitment performance in any future trial. This means that ongoing monitoring and evaluation in trials are likely to be required.
机译:背景:招募随机对照试验(RCT)是一个长期存在的问题。已经呼吁审判人员公开提供征聘表现。本文介绍了我们通过一项嵌入式过程评估招募肠癌患者心脏康复试验RCT的经验。方法:在英国三家医院进行了招募。招聘人数基于以下因素:i)估计的患者入院人数,ii)可能符合临床医生输入的纳入标准的患者人数,以及iii)先前研究中的招聘率。使用以下招聘程序:1。护士评估患者的资格2。患者签署了一份筛选表,表明对研究感兴趣并同意研究者对该研究进行研究。3。预约患者签署同意书并随机分配至干预组或对照组,记录所有考虑参加研究并随后在招募过程的每个阶段包括或排除的患者的信息以及给出的原因。在三个站点(45-359天)内授予研究管理部门批准以运行研究所需的时间有所不同。已达到最初征聘估计数的62%。招聘不足的主要原因是患者入院人数的高估。其他原因包括:i)未评估所有患者的资格; ii)未完成对合格患者的筛查表格; iii)在同意和随机分配之前签署了筛查表格的患者在研究中遗失了。结论:试点试验不应简单地旨在改善招募估计数,但也应确定可能影响将来试验中招募绩效的因素,并为该试验的招募策略提供信息。试行试验是RCT设计的关键部分。尽管如此,试点试验可能规模较小,仅涉及少量站点,站点之间的上下文差异可能会影响以后的任何试验中的招聘绩效。这意味着可能需要对试验进行持续的监视和评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号